GLMM

🏛 Architecture, Planning & Design · GLMM

GLMM

Karma · Genelleştirilmiş

GLMM is one of the statistical analyses applied automatically in MerQur. This page illustrates — on a Architecture, Planning & Design sample dataset — how the analysis is run, what the MerQur output looks like, and how the result is reported in APA 7 format.

🎯 What is it for?

GLMM automatically applies in the background all the assumption checks required for the relevant data type (normality, homogeneity of variance, etc.) and presents the results with a clear table + chart. Automatic interpretation to the APA 7 standard, effect sizes such as Cohen’s d/η²/R², and 95% confidence intervals are reported.

📌 When is it used?

  • Statistical analysis of measurements in the Architecture, Planning & Design domain
  • To produce APA 7-compatible result tables for academic publications
  • Hypothesis testing and decision-making processes
  • Undergraduate / master’s / PhD theses after the appropriate method has been selected

📐 Assumptions

  • Appropriate scale — Variables must be at the measurement level required by the analysis (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio)
  • Independent observations — Observations must come from individuals independent of one another
  • Sufficient sample size — The minimum n requirement for the analysis must be met
  • Outlier check — Outliers must be detected and evaluated

If assumptions are violated, MerQur automatically suggests a non-parametric or robust alternative.

🛠 How to do it in MerQur

1

Load the data. Select the sample file from File → Open. MerQur auto-detects column types.

2

Select the analysis. From the left side select GLMM.

3

Panel assignments (form fields in the program):

  • Bagimli degisken (DV): bocek_sayisi
  • Bagimsiz: ['zaman', 'bakim_var']
  • Grup degiskeni: saha_id
  • Family: poisson
4

Optional settings. Effect size ✓ · 95% confidence interval ✓ · Assumption checks (automatic).

5

▶ Run — click the button. Results are produced automatically as a table + chart.

6

📄 Export to Word. APA 7-formatted report with italic statistical symbols.

📊 Sample Dataset — Architecture, Planning & Design

ℹ Note: The scenario, MerQur output and interpretation below were produced by actually running the real example dataset in MerQur. Numeric results on your own data will differ; the goal is to show how the analysis is set up and interpreted end-to-end.

🎬 Example File

This analysis is demonstrated on the following example dataset for Architecture, Planning & Design:

Peyzaj_Mimarligi/56_glmm_site_time_insect.xlsx

🎬 Scenario

We model insect counts (Poisson) with time/maintenance fixed effects and a site random effect; a mixed model + count distribution (GLMM) is appropriate.

⚙️ Variable Selection

  • Dependent (count): insect_count
  • Fixed effects: time, maintenance_present
  • Random effect (group): site_id | Family: poisson

Data Preview (First 5 Rows)

site_idtimemaintenance_presentinsect_count
1114
1216
1318
14110
2103

n = 160 · Columns: site_id, time, maintenance_present, insect_count

📈 MerQur Output

GLMM RESULT ───────────────────────────────────────────── maintenance_present coefficient = -0.462, p < .001 *** Poisson GLMM: insect count ~ time + maintenance presence + (1 | site)

💬 Interpretation

We modelled insect/pest counts (Poisson) with both time/maintenance fixed effects and a site random effect — a GLMM: mixed model + count distribution. The maintenance effect is significant and negative (coef -0.46, p < .001): maintained sites have markedly fewer insects — evidence of regular maintenance’s role in pest control. GLMM combines the strengths of LMM (which assumes normality) and GLM (which ignores site clustering) for “repeated/ nested count data”. It is the correct analytic framework for landscape-health monitoring data like insect/pest counts nested within sites.

⚠ Common Mistakes

  • Misidentifying the data type (e.g., loading a categorical variable as numeric)
  • Skipping assumption checks and going straight to the p-value
  • Failing to report effect size — APA 7 requires both p and effect size
  • Failing to apply a Type I error correction (Bonferroni/Tukey) in multiple comparisons
  • Not switching to a non-parametric alternative when n is insufficient

📹 Video Walkthrough

Watch the video below for an end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis on a Architecture, Planning & Design file.

▶ GLMM — video walkthrough

This section is part of the Regresyon video (12 analyses in one video). The link below jumps straight to 20:33, where this analysis begins. Narration is in Turkish.

▶ Watch this analysis (20:33) 📺 All videos

📚 If You Used This Analysis, Cite MerQur

If you performed this analysis using MerQur in a scientific study, please use the citation below as part of your academic citation obligations (APA 7):

Örücü, Ö. K. (2026). MerQur: Integrated Academic Data Analysis & Reporting Platform [Computer software] (Version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.53463/merqur.2026001

For BibTeX, RIS, EndNote and the English citation form: all citation formats →

Sources:
  1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  2. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.