GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations)

🏥 Health Sciences · GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations)

GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations)

Karma · Tekrarlı

GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations) is one of the statistical analyses applied automatically in MerQur. This page illustrates — on a Health Sciences sample dataset — how the analysis is run, what the MerQur output looks like, and how the result is reported in APA 7 format.

🎯 What is it for?

GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations) automatically performs all assumption checks required for the data type (normality, homogeneity of variance, etc.) in the background and presents the results in a clear table + chart. Automatic APA 7-formatted interpretation, effect sizes (Cohen’s d, η², R²) and 95% confidence intervals are reported.

📌 When is it used?

  • Statistical analysis of measurements in the Health Sciences domain
  • To produce APA 7-compatible result tables for academic publications
  • Hypothesis testing and decision-making processes
  • Undergraduate / master’s / PhD theses after the appropriate method has been selected

📐 Assumptions

  • Appropriate scale — Variables must be at the measurement level required by the analysis (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio)
  • Independent observations — Observations must come from individuals independent of one another
  • Sufficient sample size — The minimum n requirement for the analysis must be met
  • Outlier check — Outliers must be detected and evaluated

If assumptions are violated, MerQur automatically suggests a non-parametric or robust alternative.

🛠 How to do it in MerQur

1

Load the data. Select the sample file from File → Open. MerQur auto-detects column types.

2

Select the analysis. From the left side select GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations).

3

Panel assignments (form fields in the program):

  • Bagimli degisken (DV): HbA1c
  • Bagimsiz: ['tedavi', 'vizit']
  • Grup degiskeni: hasta_id
  • Family: gaussian
  • Kovaryans yapisi: exchangeable
4

Optional settings. Effect size ✓ · 95% confidence interval ✓ · Assumption checks (automatic).

5

▶ Run — click the button. Results are produced automatically as a table + chart.

6

📄 Export to Word. APA 7-formatted report with italic statistical symbols.

📊 Sample Dataset — Health Sciences

ℹ Note: The scenario, MerQur output and interpretation below were produced by actually running the real example dataset in MerQur. Numeric results on your own data will differ; the goal is to show how the analysis is set up and interpreted end-to-end.

🎬 Example File

This analysis is demonstrated on the following example dataset for Health Sciences:

Tip/55_gee_HbA1c_treatment.xlsx

🎬 Scenario

We model HbA1c in repeated visit measures of the same patients. For a population-average effect, GEE is appropriate.

⚙️ Variable Selection

  • Dependent variable: HbA1c
  • Predictor(s): visit
  • Cluster: patient_id

Data Preview (First 5 Rows)

patient_idvisittreatmentHbA1c
11dense8.18
12dense7.19
13dense7.67
14dense6.35
15dense7.28

n = 300 · Columns: patient_id, visit, treatment, HbA1c

📈 MerQur Output

GEE (GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS) RESULT ───────────────────────────────────────────── visit coef = -0.098 p < .001 *** QIC = 306.75 outcome: HbA1c group: patient_id

💬 Interpretation

We modeled HbA1c in repeated visit measures of the same patients; the visit effect is significant and negative (b = -0.098, p < .001) — HbA1c declines over follow-up. GEE estimates the POPULATION-AVERAGE effect rather than individual effects in repeated/clustered data and corrects within-group correlation with a “working correlation structure”. While LMM focuses on individual random effects, GEE focuses on the average trend. In medicine it is preferred for population-level questions like “what is the time/treatment effect in the average patient?”.

⚠ Common Mistakes

  • Misidentifying the data type (e.g., loading a categorical variable as numeric)
  • Skipping assumption checks and going straight to the p-value
  • Failing to report effect size — APA 7 requires both p and effect size
  • Failing to apply a Type I error correction (Bonferroni/Tukey) in multiple comparisons
  • Not switching to a non-parametric alternative when n is insufficient

📹 Video Walkthrough

Watch the video below for an end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis on a Health Sciences file.

▶ GEE (Generalized Estimating Equations) — video walkthrough

A complete end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis in MerQur, narrated on screen. Narration is in Turkish.

▶ Watch the video 📺 All videos

📚 If You Used This Analysis, Cite MerQur

If you performed this analysis using MerQur in a scientific study, please use the citation below as part of your academic citation obligations (APA 7):

Örücü, Ö. K. (2026). MerQur: Integrated Academic Data Analysis & Reporting Platform [Computer software] (Version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.53463/merqur.2026001

For BibTeX, RIS, EndNote and the English citation form: all citation formats →

Sources:
  1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  2. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.