Two-Way ANOVA

📊 Social, Humanities & Admin Sciences · Two-Way ANOVA

Two-Way ANOVA

Parametrik · Faktöriyel ANOVA
🆕 New in v1.0.5: A Chart tab was added to this analysis (boxplot, interaction, profile, bar, scatter, biplot, or forecast — depending on analysis type).

Two-Way ANOVA is one of the statistical analyses applied automatically in MerQur. This page illustrates — on a Social, Humanities & Admin Sciences sample dataset — how the analysis is run, what the MerQur output looks like, and how the result is reported in APA 7 format.

🎯 What is it for?

Two-Way ANOVA automatically applies all necessary assumption checks (normality, homogeneity of variance, etc.) for the relevant data type in the background and presents the results with a clear table + chart. Automated interpretation to the APA 7 standard, effect sizes such as Cohen’s d/η²/R², and 95% confidence intervals are reported.

📌 When is it used?

  • Statistical analysis of measurements in the Social, Humanities & Admin Sciences domain
  • To produce APA 7-compatible result tables for academic publications
  • Hypothesis testing and decision-making processes
  • Undergraduate / master’s / PhD theses after the appropriate method has been selected

📐 Assumptions

  • Appropriate scale — Variables must be at the measurement level required by the analysis (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio)
  • Independent observations — Observations must come from individuals independent of one another
  • Sufficient sample size — The minimum n requirement for the analysis must be met
  • Outlier check — Outliers must be detected and evaluated

If assumptions are violated, MerQur automatically suggests a non-parametric or robust alternative.

🛠 How to do it in MerQur

1

Load the data. Select the sample file from File → Open. MerQur auto-detects column types.

2

Select the analysis. From the left side select Two-Way ANOVA.

3

Panel assignments (form fields in the program):

  • Factor 1: cinsiyet
  • Factor 2: yontem
  • Value Column: puan
4

Optional settings. Effect size ✓ · 95% confidence interval ✓ · Assumption checks (automatic).

5

▶ Run — click the button. Results are produced automatically as a table + chart.

6

📄 Export to Word. APA 7-formatted report with italic statistical symbols.

📊 Sample Dataset — Social, Humanities & Administrative Sciences

ℹ Note: The scenario, MerQur output and interpretation below were produced by actually running the real example dataset in MerQur. Numeric results on your own data will differ; the goal is to show how the analysis is set up and interpreted end-to-end.

🎬 Example File

This analysis is demonstrated on the following example dataset for Social, Humanities & Administrative Sciences:

Sosyal_Beseri/07_two_way_anova.xlsx

🎬 Scenario

We examine the main effects and interaction of method and sex on achievement simultaneously. With two categorical factors, two-way ANOVA is appropriate.

⚙️ Variable Selection

  • Dependent variable: score
  • Factor (categorical): method
  • 2nd Factor: sex
  • >> ADVANCED PARAMETERS (optional in the form — what they do):
  • Sum-of-squares type (I/II/III): Type III for unbalanced designs with interaction (SPSS default).
  • Post-hoc (Tukey/Bonferroni/Games-Howell) for 3+ level factors.
  • Effect sizes: partial eta-squared, eta-squared, omega-squared.
  • Levene & residual Shapiro; cell and marginal means tables.

Data Preview (First 5 Rows)

student_idmethodsexscore
1traditionalfemale81.8
2traditionalfemale72.0
3traditionalfemale66.0
4traditionalfemale74.9
5traditionalfemale58.6

n = 150 · Columns: student_id, method, sex, score

📈 MerQur Output

TWO-WAY ANOVA RESULT ───────────────────────────────────────────── method (main effect): F(2) = 43.85 p < .001 *** eta^2p = 0.379 sex (main effect) : F(1) = 0.42 p = 0.519 ns eta^2p = 0.003

💬 Interpretation

We examined two factors at once: how do instruction method and sex affect the achievement score? The method main effect is very strong (F(2) = 43.85, p < .001, eta^2p = 0.38), while the sex main effect is non-significant (p = 0.52). The decisive driver of the score is method; sex alone contributes nothing notable. The power of two-way ANOVA is that it tests both factors and their interaction in a single model — isolating each factor’s pure effect with the other controlled. It is ideal for answering “which variable really makes a difference?” in education. >> ADVANCED PARAMETERS (optional in the form — what they do): – Sum-of-squares type (I/II/III): Type III for unbalanced designs with interaction (SPSS default). – Post-hoc (Tukey/Bonferroni/Games-Howell) for 3+ level factors. – Effect sizes: partial eta-squared, eta-squared, omega-squared. – Levene & residual Shapiro; cell and marginal means tables.

⚠ Common Mistakes

  • Misidentifying the data type (e.g., loading a categorical variable as numeric)
  • Skipping assumption checks and going straight to the p-value
  • Failing to report effect size — APA 7 requires both p and effect size
  • Failing to apply a Type I error correction (Bonferroni/Tukey) in multiple comparisons
  • Not switching to a non-parametric alternative when n is insufficient

📹 Video Walkthrough

Watch the video below for an end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis on a Social, Humanities & Admin Sciences file.

▶ Two-Way ANOVA — video walkthrough

A complete end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis in MerQur, narrated on screen. Narration is in Turkish.

▶ Watch the video 📺 All videos

📚 If You Used This Analysis, Cite MerQur

If you performed this analysis using MerQur in a scientific study, please use the citation below as part of your academic citation obligations (APA 7):

Örücü, Ö. K. (2026). MerQur: Integrated Academic Data Analysis & Reporting Platform [Computer software] (Version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.53463/merqur.2026001

For BibTeX, RIS, EndNote and the English citation form: all citation formats →

Sources:
  1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  2. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.