Mann-Whitney U Test
Mann-Whitney U Test is one of the statistical analyses applied automatically in MerQur. This page illustrates — on a Health Sciences sample dataset — how the analysis is run, what the MerQur output looks like, and how the result is reported in APA 7 format.
🎯 What is it for?
Mann-Whitney U Test automatically performs all assumption checks required for the data type (normality, homogeneity of variance, etc.) in the background and presents the results in a clear table + chart. Automatic APA 7-formatted interpretation, effect sizes (Cohen’s d, η², R²) and 95% confidence intervals are reported.
📌 When is it used?
- Statistical analysis of measurements in the Health Sciences domain
- To produce APA 7-compatible result tables for academic publications
- Hypothesis testing and decision-making processes
- Undergraduate / master’s / PhD theses after the appropriate method has been selected
📐 Assumptions
- Appropriate scale — Variables must be at the measurement level required by the analysis (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio)
- Independent observations — Observations must come from individuals independent of one another
- Sufficient sample size — The minimum n requirement for the analysis must be met
- Outlier check — Outliers must be detected and evaluated
If assumptions are violated, MerQur automatically suggests a non-parametric or robust alternative.
🛠 How to do it in MerQur
Load the data. Select the sample file from File → Open. MerQur auto-detects column types.
Select the analysis. From the left side select Mann-Whitney U Test.
Panel assignments (form fields in the program):
- Group Column:
diabet_tipi - Value Column:
yasam_kalitesi
Optional settings. Effect size ✓ · 95% confidence interval ✓ · Assumption checks (automatic).
▶ Run — click the button. Results are produced automatically as a table + chart.
📄 Export to Word. APA 7-formatted report with italic statistical symbols.
📊 Sample Dataset — Health Sciences
ℹ Note: The scenario, MerQur output and interpretation below were produced by actually running the real example dataset in MerQur. Numeric results on your own data will differ; the goal is to show how the analysis is set up and interpreted end-to-end.
🎬 Example File
This analysis is demonstrated on the following example dataset for Health Sciences:
Tip/14_mann_whitney_diabetes_survival_quality.xlsx
🎬 Scenario
We compare the survival-quality distribution of two diabetes types. Since normality fails, Mann-Whitney is appropriate.
⚙️ Variable Selection
- Grouping (categorical): diabetes_type
- Test variable: survival_quality
- >> ADVANCED PARAMETERS (optional in the form — what they do):
- Hypothesis direction; continuity correction.
- Computation method: auto / exact (precise for small n) / asymptotic.
- Effect sizes: CLES and Z/sqrt(N) (rank-biserial r already shown).
- Descriptives (median etc.).
Data Preview (First 5 Rows)
| patient_id | diabetes_type | survival_quality |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | type-1 | 4 |
| 35 | type-1 | 3 |
| 40 | type-1 | 4 |
| 70 | type-2 | 7 |
| 63 | type-2 | 3 |
n = 85 · Columns: patient_id, diabetes_type, survival_quality
📈 MerQur Output
💬 Interpretation
We compared the survival-quality distribution of two diabetes types (diabetes_type) based on ranks rather than means: U = 886.5, p = 0.907, a negligible effect (r = 0.02) — no significant difference. Mann-Whitney is the nonparametric counterpart of the t-test; when normality fails or the scale is ordinal, it is the right way to compare two groups. Here the “no difference” result tells us the two diabetes types are similar in survival quality. >> ADVANCED PARAMETERS (optional in the form — what they do): – Hypothesis direction; continuity correction. – Computation method: auto / exact (precise for small n) / asymptotic. – Effect sizes: CLES and Z/sqrt(N) (rank-biserial r already shown). – Descriptives (median etc.).
⚠ Common Mistakes
- Misidentifying the data type (e.g., loading a categorical variable as numeric)
- Skipping assumption checks and going straight to the p-value
- Failing to report effect size — APA 7 requires both p and effect size
- Failing to apply a Type I error correction (Bonferroni/Tukey) in multiple comparisons
- Not switching to a non-parametric alternative when n is insufficient
📹 Video Walkthrough
Watch the video below for an end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis on a Health Sciences file.
▶ Mann-Whitney U Test — video walkthrough
A complete end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis in MerQur, narrated on screen. Narration is in Turkish.
🎓 Education Sciences · 🧪 Natural Sciences & Mathematics · 🏛 Architecture, Planning & Design · ⚙ Engineering · 📊 Social, Humanities & Admin Sciences · 🏃 Sport Sciences · 🌾 Agriculture, Forestry & Aquatic
📚 If You Used This Analysis, Cite MerQur
If you performed this analysis using MerQur in a scientific study, please use the citation below as part of your academic citation obligations (APA 7):
Örücü, Ö. K. (2026). MerQur: Integrated Academic Data Analysis & Reporting Platform [Computer software] (Version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.53463/merqur.2026001
For BibTeX, RIS, EndNote and the English citation form: all citation formats →
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.