Correspondence Analysis

🏃 Sport Sciences · Correspondence Analysis

Correspondence Analysis

Multivariate · Categorical
🆕 New in v1.0.5: A Chart tab was added to this analysis (boxplot, interaction, profile, bar, scatter, biplot, or forecast — depending on analysis type).

Correspondence Analysis is one of the statistical analyses applied automatically in MerQur. This page illustrates — on a Sport Sciences sample dataset — how the analysis is run, what the MerQur output looks like, and how the result is reported in APA 7 format.

🎯 What is it for?

Correspondence Analysis automatically performs, in the background, all the assumption checks required for the relevant data type (normality, homogeneity of variance, etc.) and presents the results with a clear table and chart. Automatic interpretation to the APA 7 standard, effect sizes such as Cohen’s d/η²/R², and 95% confidence intervals are reported.

📌 When is it used?

  • Statistical analysis of measurements in the Sport Sciences domain
  • To produce APA 7-compatible result tables for academic publications
  • Hypothesis testing and decision-making processes
  • Undergraduate / master’s / PhD theses after the appropriate method has been selected

📐 Assumptions

  • Appropriate scale — Variables must be at the measurement level required by the analysis (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio)
  • Independent observations — Observations must come from individuals independent of one another
  • Sufficient sample size — The minimum n requirement for the analysis must be met
  • Outlier check — Outliers must be detected and evaluated

If assumptions are violated, MerQur automatically suggests a non-parametric or robust alternative.

🛠 How to do it in MerQur

1

Load the data. Select the sample file from File → Open. MerQur auto-detects column types.

2

Select the analysis. From the left side select Correspondence Analysis.

3

Panel assignments (form fields in the program):

  • error: cats() got an unexpected keyword argument 'max_unique'
4

Optional settings. Effect size ✓ · 95% confidence interval ✓ · Assumption checks (automatic).

5

▶ Run — click the button. Results are produced automatically as a table + chart.

6

📄 Export to Word. APA 7-formatted report with italic statistical symbols.

📊 Sample Dataset — Sport Sciences

ℹ Note: The scenario, MerQur output and interpretation below were produced by actually running the real example dataset in MerQur. Numeric results on your own data will differ; the goal is to show how the analysis is set up and interpreted end-to-end.

🎬 Example File

This analysis is demonstrated on the following example dataset for Sport Sciences:

Spor_Bilimleri/37_ca_discipline_time.xlsx

🎬 Scenario

We map the relationship between discipline and training time. To see the structure of two categorical variables, CA is appropriate.

⚙️ Variable Selection

  • Variables: discipline
  • Variables: training_time

Data Preview (First 5 Rows)

athlete_iddisciplinetraining_time
1sprintmorning
2sprintmorning
3sprintmorning
4sprintmorning
5sprintmorning

n = 370 · Columns: athlete_id, discipline, training_time

📈 MerQur Output

CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS RESULT ───────────────────────────────────────────── Total inertia = 0.043 (2 dimensions) discipline x training_time

💬 Interpretation

We mapped the relationship in the cross-tab of two categorical variables (discipline x training time) into a visual space with correspondence analysis: total inertia 0.043 (weak relationship) resolved over two dimensions. CA positions the chi-square relationship in a two-dimensional space, showing which categories are close (co-occurring). In sports science it is powerful for visually interpreting the structure of qualitative relationships such as discipline-time, discipline-preference; the low inertia indicates the relationship is weak.

⚠ Common Mistakes

  • Misidentifying the data type (e.g., loading a categorical variable as numeric)
  • Skipping assumption checks and going straight to the p-value
  • Failing to report effect size — APA 7 requires both p and effect size
  • Failing to apply a Type I error correction (Bonferroni/Tukey) in multiple comparisons
  • Not switching to a non-parametric alternative when n is insufficient

📹 Video Walkthrough

Watch the video below for an end-to-end walkthrough of this analysis on a Sport Sciences file.

▶ Correspondence Analysis — video walkthrough

This section is part of the İlişki ve Korelasyon video (6 analyses in one video). The link below jumps straight to 7:09, where this analysis begins. Narration is in Turkish.

▶ Watch this analysis (7:09) 📺 All videos

📚 If You Used This Analysis, Cite MerQur

If you performed this analysis using MerQur in a scientific study, please use the citation below as part of your academic citation obligations (APA 7):

Örücü, Ö. K. (2026). MerQur: Integrated Academic Data Analysis & Reporting Platform [Computer software] (Version 1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.53463/merqur.2026001

For BibTeX, RIS, EndNote and the English citation form: all citation formats →

Sources:
  1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  2. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.